COINCIDENCE is not generally something scientists have much truck with. If two things are genuinely unrelated, there is little further of interest to be said. If the coincidence keeps turning up, however, there must be some deeper underlying link. Then it is the job of science to tease out what it is and so explain why there was no coincidence in the first place.
That makes it rather odd that a large chunk of modern physics is precariously balanced on a whopping coincidence.
This coincidence is essential to the way we view and define mass. It is so fundamental to the world's workings that most of us encounter its consequences every day without giving them another thought. Yet it has vexed some of the best minds in physics for centuries. Galileo and Newton grappled with it, and ended up just accepting it, rather than understanding it. Einstein went one better: ...
To continue reading this article, subscribe to receive access to all of newscientist.com, including 20 years of archive content.
Sacrificing Einstein: Relativity's keystone has to go
This article
Sacrificing Einstein: Relativity's keystone has to go
can be opened in url
http://newsstonefish.blogspot.com/2013/01/sacrificing-einstein-relativity.html
Sacrificing Einstein: Relativity's keystone has to go
